Comments Off on Can Christians become absolutely sinless?
By Spencer D Gear PhD
How would you, as a Christian, respond to this provocative question?
Why did God / Christ call us to be Holy and Perfect when he knew we are sinners? What was He exhorting us to do / be?
The Scriptures used for support were:
- 1 Peter 1:16, ‘Be holy, for I am holy’, and
- Matt 5:48, ‘Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect’.
This article will pursue the meaning of ‘perfect’ (Matt 5:48).
- The KJV states, ‘Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect’’
- The NRSV translation, ‘Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect’.
- International Standard Version (ISV): ‘So be perfect [or mature],as your heavenly Father is perfect [or mature]’.
- Revised English Bible (REB): ‘There must be no limit to your goodness, as your heavenly Father’s goodness knows no bounds’.
These four translations demonstrate how ‘perfect’ as an English meaning may not be the best understanding of the koine Greek for that word. Let’s seek some further information.
If not perfection, what is it?
The problem we have is with the English meaning of ‘perfect’ that communicates the idea of complete or absolute sinlessness. Even with Jesus living in me, I’m incapable of that standard – because I have a sinful nature that God does not have.
What are the alternatives?
(1) Either God is requiring something I cannot attain (perfection) – which makes God a liar (which He is not – Heb 6:18), or
(2) In the original languages, ‘perfection’ has a meaning that is different from our English understanding.
Teleios exposes the meaning
The word for ‘perfect’ in Matt 5:48 is teleios. It refers to a goal and I don’t know one single word in English to convey its meaning. It doesn’t mean absolute sinlessness, just like God cannot sin, because if we go back to Matt 5:6, the disciples are blessed if they ‘hunger and thirst for righteousness’. Verse 7 states, ‘Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy’ (NIV). They are not yet completely merciful but will be shown mercy by God if they engage in merciful acts.
Therefore, I conclude that ‘perfect’ is not the meaning of teleios. In fact, it’s a misleading interpretation of the original. The statement of Matt 5:48 comes from Deut 18:13, ‘Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God’ (KJV), which modern translations render as, ‘You shall be blameless before the Lord your God’ (NKJV). Here, ‘perfect’ is the Hebrew, tham, which means ‘complete’, like a whole number (Lenski).
Westminster vs Wesley
The Westminster Shorter Catechism, Question 35, asked: What is sanctification? ‘Sanctification is the work of God’s free grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole man, after the image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto sin, and live unto righteousness’.
By contrast, John Wesley in ‘A Plain Account of Christian Perfection’ wrote:
“To explain myself a little farther on this head: (1.) Not only sin, properly so called, (that is, a voluntary transgression of a known law,) but sin, improperly so called, (that is, an involuntary transgression of a divine law, known or unknown,) needs the atoning blood. (2.) I believe there is no such perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary transgressions which I apprehend to be naturally consequent on the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality. (3.) Therefore sinless perfection is a phrase I never use, lest I should seem to contradict myself. (4.) I believe, a person filled with the love of God is still liable to these involuntary transgressions. (5.) Such transgressions you may call sins, if you please: I do not, for the reasons above-mentioned”.
So the Westminster Calvinistic divines maintained that the Christian is renewed in the whole person and is enabled to die to sin and live for righteousness – which is progressive sanctification.
By contrast, Wesley considered that when a person voluntarily committed sins, it was possible to stop these as the person grew to Christian maturity.
However, the Wesleyan Methodist Church of Australia, as an example of a Wesleyan approach to sanctification, states that ‘our mission’ is to …
spread scriptural holiness throughout every land…. [This involves] guiding believers to experience entire sanctification so that they are enabled to live whole and holy lives (Wesleyan Methodist Church Australia, Our Mission).
The Church of the Nazarene adopts a similar perspective on entire sanctification.
We are called to reach the goal of maturity in Christ, to become blameless, complete, and people of integrity in his sight.
There is a divergence of interpretation among certain denominations on this topic. Some believe in progressive sanctification / holiness while others pursue cessation of deliberate voluntary sin, calling the effect entire sanctification.
 When I refer to a Christian, I mean an evangelical Christian who believes and proclaims the Gospel of salvation through Christ alone (Acts 4:12).
 Christian Forums.net 2018. ‘Are Christians called to be holy and perfect?’ Rajesh Sahu#1, 6 April. Available at: https://christianforums.net/Fellowship/index.php?threads/are-christians-called-to-be-holy-and-perfect.75394/ (Accessed 8 April 2018).
 This was given as a footnote in the ISV text.
 Ibid. CFnet.
 The following is my response as OzSpen#18 on CFnet.
Copyright © 2018 Spencer D. Gear. This document last updated at Date: 24 May 2018